Abstrak
This study addresses the need for Islamic Economics graduates to acquire not only theoretical knowledge but also practical English communication skills, in order to meet the challenges of global economic integration and the Islamic finance industry. The research aims to redesign English for Economics courses by applying principles of Outcome-Based Education (OBE). Using a qualitative descriptive design, this study analyzes curriculum documents, previous research, and case examples from Islamic universities to examine the integration of communicative competence, critical thinking, and contextual understanding into course design. The findings indicate that OBE-based instruction enhances students’ linguistic proficiency, professional readiness, and international engagement by aligning learning outcomes with industry requirements. The study contributes to curriculum development by offering a framework for implementing OBE in English for Islamic Economics. Its novelty lies in positioning OBE as a strategic approach to bridge the gap between traditional reading-focused instruction and the real-world communicative demands of Islamic economics education.
Referensi
Abasimel, N. A. (2023). Islamic Banking and Economics: Concepts and Instruments, Features, Advantages, Differences from Conventional Banks, and Contributions to Economic Growth. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00940-z
Bhandari, P. (2023). Triangulation in Research: Guide to Types and Examples. In Article (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
Compliance, S. (1997). Shariah compliance 1. Appendix C: Shariah Compliance.
Dashtestani, R., & Stojković, N. (2015). the Journal of Teaching English for the Use of Technology in English for Specific Purposes (Esp) Instruction: a Literature Review. Specific and Academic Purposes, 3(January).
Fadilah, N. (2020). Konsep Kesejahteraan Sosial dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Islam. SALIMIYA: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Keagamaan Islam, 1(1).
Hanafi, Y. (2020). The Changing of the Islamic Education Curriculum Paradigm in Public Universities. Al-Ta Lim Journal, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v26i3.552
Haryanto, H., Purwanto, P., & Giyoto, G. (2021). Learning English for Specific Purposes through Blended Learning at Public Islamic University (A Case Study at Private University Jepara, Indonesia). Technium Social Sciences Journal, 26. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v26i1.5319
Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20173
Hyland, K. (2000). Developments in English for specific purposes: a multi-disciplinary approach; Tony Dudley-Evans and Maggie-Jo St John. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, 301 pp. English for Specific Purposes, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(99)00026-5
Jalalabadi, F., Grome, L., Shahrestani, N., Izaddoost, S. A., & Reece, E. M. (2018). Entrepreneurial Strategies to Seek Venture Capital Funding. Seminars in Plastic Surgery, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1672168
Jenkins, J. (2014). Global Englishes: A resource book for students: Third edition. In Global Englishes: A Resource Book for Students: Third Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761596
Katawazai, R. (2021). Implementing Outcome-Based Education and Student-Centered Learning in Afghan Public Universities: Current Practices and Challenges. Heliyon, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07076
Le, H. T. T. (2018). Impacts of the CEFR-Aligned Learning Outcomes Implementation on Assessment Practice. Hue University Journal of Science: Social Sciences and Humanities, 127(6B). https://doi.org/10.26459/hueuni-jssh.v127i6b.4899
Lie, A., Tamah, S. M., & Gozali, I. (2022). The Impact of a Teacher Professional Education Program on English Language Use. TESL-EJ, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.25100a6
Luo, L. (2019). Pursuing Authenticity In ESP Testing – The Need For Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1902159L
Mujianti, Y. I., Umamah, N., Marjono, SUmardi, & Surya, R. A. (2021). The Differences Between Problem-Based Learning Models & Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition Models in Critical Thinking and Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Historica, 5(2).
Musa, N. C., Nizam, A. S., Mohamad, W. N., Ashiqin W., & Othman, Z. (2021). Framing the English Language (EL) CEFR-informed Curriculum Structure: The UKM Experience. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.s3.13
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. T. (2012). Qualitative analysis techniques for the review of the literature. Qualitative Report, 17(28). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1754
Pratiwi, D. N., Setiyowati, A., SM, A. Y., & Nuzula, R. F. (2023). Implementasi Produk Investasi Sukuk Ritel SR 017 Pada Bank Syariah Indonesia KCP Rungkut 1 Surabaya. Musyarakah: Journal of Sharia Economic (MJSE), 12(1). https://doi.org/10.24269/mjse.v12i1.6500
Rasyid, M. N. A. (2022). Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices Towards Language Assessment in an Indonesian Islamic University. Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English. https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v0i0.4475
Robinett, B. W., Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1988). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centred Approach. The Modern Language Journal, 72(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/327576
Saher, A. S., Ali, A. M. J., Amani, D., & Najwan, F. (2022). Traditional Versus Authentic Assessments in Higher Education. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.01.29
Sholeh, M. I. (2023). Technology Integration in Islamic Education: Policy Framework and Adoption Challenges. Journal of Modern Islamic Studies and Civilization, 1(02), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.59653/jmisc.v1i02.155
Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. American Association of School Administrators, Arlington, Virginia.
Suwandi, S. (2023). English Language Skills for Islamic Economic Students: Expectation versus Reality. New Horizons in English Studies, 8. https://doi.org/10.17951/nh.2023.8.73-90
Tsou, W., & Chen, F. (2014). ESP program evaluation framework: Description and application to a Taiwanese university ESP program. English for Specific Purposes, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.07.008
Uddin, Md. A., & Halim, A. (2015). Islamic Monetary Policy: Is There an Alternative to Interest Rate? Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 67697.